For most composting toilet projects, the real issue is not whether the technology sounds acceptable in principle. The real issue is understanding what pathway applies to your project, what evidence may be needed, and who may need to be involved before the system is installed.
At WCTNZ®, we find that many customers are told very broad yes-or-no answers when the real position is more detailed than that. In New Zealand, the pathway can depend on the building work, the toilet system, whether the site is connected to a sewer, how greywater will be managed, and what local and regional rules apply to the land.
A composting toilet project is often assessed as part of a wider building, sanitation and wastewater arrangement. The toilet product matters, but so do the building work, ventilation, user load, maintenance, greywater pathway, any urine or leachate pathway, site conditions and regional discharge rules.
The best outcome usually comes from identifying the likely pathway early, before the wrong assumptions are locked into product selection, building design or site layout.
These are the practical questions that usually decide the pathway. They are deliberately simple because most customers need a clear starting point before getting into standards, clauses, regional rules or engineering detail.
Is the project mainly a building-consent question, a resource-consent question, a permitted-activity question, or a combination of these?
Does the proposed building work, sanitary facility, installation method or Alternative Solution pathway need Building Consent Authority review?
Does a sewer connection affect the drainage system, and does that actually prevent the proposed waterless or non-water-borne toilet arrangement?
Do regional rules, greywater, leachate, land application, compost end-product handling or site conditions trigger a consent or further assessment?
How will the remaining wastewater be collected, treated, discharged or reused once the toilet waste stream is separated?
Does the work need an authorised person, plumber, drainlayer, installer, wastewater designer, architect, engineer or consent specialist?
For many projects, there are two separate questions to think about. The first is the building and sanitation side: does the proposed work require building consent, and how will the completed system show compliance with the Building Code? The second is the planning and discharge side: do regional rules, site conditions, or discharge controls trigger a resource consent or a more formal engineering review?
These two pathways overlap, but they are not the same thing. A project may appear straightforward from a product point of view while still needing more careful thought from a site, wastewater, or council-processing point of view.
The Building Consent Authority considers building work and Building Code compliance. For a composting toilet, that may include sanitary facilities, ventilation, safe disposal, installation details, product evidence, Alternative Solution evidence and inspection requirements.
Regional rules may apply to greywater, leachate, liquid discharge, land application, compost end-product management, surface water, groundwater, setbacks and permitted-activity conditions. This can sit with a regional council or a unitary authority.
A project can be acceptable from a product point of view but still need wastewater design or regional rule confirmation. Equally, a regional permitted activity pathway does not automatically remove building consent or Building Code considerations.
In many fixed installations, building consent is commonly part of the pathway unless a specific exemption applies. Building work in New Zealand generally requires consent unless it falls within an exemption, and exempt work still has to comply with the Building Code. That means a composting toilet project still needs to be considered within the legal framework, even where the system is different from a conventional sewered toilet.
There are exemptions for certain plumbing and drainlaying jobs, but they are limited. Some alteration, repair, maintenance, and replacement work may be exempt when it is done by an authorised person. However, those exemptions do not automatically turn a composting toilet project into a simple swap-out exercise. The wider project still needs to be looked at properly.
Do not assume “no flush” means “no consent issue.” The question is whether the proposed work, sanitary arrangement and disposal pathway meet the Building Code and any relevant council requirements for that site.
Where a mains sewer connection is available, the legal position needs to be stated carefully. Building Code Clause G13 refers to the drainage system being connected to sewer where a sewer connection is available. That requirement should not be oversimplified into a claim that a sewer-connected property can never include a composting toilet or other non-water-borne toilet arrangement.
New Zealand’s Building Code also recognises non-water-borne disposal, provided it forms part of a healthy and safe disposal system. In practical terms, a sewered site should not be assumed to be limited to flushing toilets only. Once the required sewer connection for the drainage system is addressed, an additional waterless or non-water-borne toilet arrangement may still be workable in some projects, but it needs to be checked carefully against the specific design, use case, Building Code requirements and the relevant council or network-utility position.
A “must connect” rule should not automatically be read as a blanket statement that every toilet on the property must always be sewer-connected. Where a sewer connection is available, the drainage system may still need to connect to sewer, but that does not necessarily mean a sewered site can never include a waterless or non-water-borne toilet arrangement. The safer position is that sewered sites need project-specific checking, including the proposed drainage system, the non-water-borne disposal pathway, Building Code G1/G13 requirements, and the relevant council or network-utility position.
This is not a shortcut around compliance. It simply means the proposal should be assessed for what it is: the sewered drainage system on one hand, and any separate non-water-borne toilet/disposal pathway on the other.
MBIE — G13 Foul Water Building Regulations 1992 — G1 Personal Hygiene
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Resource consent depends heavily on regional rules, discharge conditions, and the site itself. In some regions, onsite wastewater activities may already sit within a permitted pathway if stated conditions are met. In others, the project may need a more formal application, stronger supporting information, or a clearer engineering case.
That is why one council area may present a relatively direct pathway, while another may be more consent-led. It is also why informal verbal advice from a front counter or a casual phone call is not always the final answer on its own.
A composting toilet does not remove the need to think about the rest of the wastewater system. Even where blackwater is reduced or removed, greywater still has to be managed properly. In practical terms, many composting toilet projects are assessed as part of a wider sanitation proposal rather than as a toilet-only decision.
That means the pathway may still depend on how greywater is treated, where it goes, and whether the site conditions support the proposed arrangement. A strong project usually looks at the whole sanitation picture early rather than dealing with the toilet in isolation.
Shows the toilet technology, model, capacity, operating requirements, installation conditions and evidence pathway for the Waterless Composting Toilet itself.
Shows how greywater, liquids, leachate, land application or other wastewater streams are managed for the actual site and use load.
Recognised certification and standard-based technical evidence are often what help bridge the gap between product information and a council’s compliance pathway. They do not remove the need to assess the wider project, but they can make the product-level discussion more straightforward and give councils, designers, and consent officers a clearer starting point.
In practical terms, strong product evidence helps separate the product-level question from the site-specific wastewater, building consent and discharge pathway questions. That separation is important because a product-standard certificate may answer one question, while greywater, land application, ventilation, maintenance, user load or regional discharge rules may still need their own supporting information.
In the waterless composting toilet space, the key product-level standard is AS/NZS 1546.2:2008 – On-site domestic wastewater treatment units – Waterless composting toilets. It gives Waterless Composting Toilets a recognised technical benchmark, so the product discussion can be based on evidence rather than marketing claims alone.
The wider sanitation proposal may still need to be considered through AS/NZS 1547:2012 – On-site domestic wastewater management, where relevant to the project. That wider framework is where site conditions, wastewater flows, land application, installation, operation, maintenance, monitoring, and the full project pathway become important.
AS/NZS 1546.2:2008 – On-site domestic wastewater treatment units – Waterless composting toilets is the key product-level standard for Waterless Composting Toilets.
AS/NZS 1547:2012 – On-site domestic wastewater management may be relevant to wider wastewater management, including treatment units, land application, site assessment, operation and maintenance.
Product certification may answer a product-standard question. It may not answer a site-specific wastewater, greywater, ventilation, use-load or discharge-rule question. A good application separates those issues rather than trying to solve everything with one document.
Compare building product certification and assurance schemes »
The consent pathway is not just about what is being installed. It is also about who is carrying out the work. Some plumbing and drainlaying work may only sit within exemption pathways when completed by an authorised person. That matters because even where a project looks simple, the work itself may still need to be carried out by the correct licensed or authorised people.
Where the project becomes more site-specific, more technical, or more formal in its pathway, it may also require support from a wastewater engineer, architect, drainlayer, plumber, consent specialist, or a combination of those people.
Product selection, model information, certification references, operating documentation, technical resources and general pathway guidance.
Site-and-soil assessment, greywater design, land application, discharge pathway, loading assumptions, reserve area and consent-support reporting.
Installation work, sanitary plumbing or drainage, ventilation coordination, connections and site implementation within the approved design.
Building layout, room design, access, floor levels, penetrations, service zones, consent drawings and integration into the wider building project.
Building consent, Building Code review, inspections, Code Compliance Certificate and district planning matters.
Regional plan rules, discharge-to-land, water quality, permitted activity conditions and resource consent where required.
The steps below are a practical way to approach a project before time and cost are locked into the wrong assumptions.
Clarify whether the project is a full-time home, bach, tiny home, public facility, workplace, remote site, campground, accessory building or mobile/temporary use.
Confirm the toilet model, capacity, operating pathway, ventilation, solids management, liquids handling, servicing access and maintenance requirements.
Prepare product evidence for the toilet and separate site information for greywater, land application, discharge or any wider wastewater design.
Confirm whether the work is consented building work, exempt work, Alternative Solution work, or part of a larger consent package.
Confirm whether permitted activity conditions apply, or whether resource consent, a certificate of compliance, or wastewater designer input may be needed.
Use the right mix of WCTNZ® product support, council advice, wastewater design, plumbing/drainlaying input, building design and consent preparation.
Not every informal enquiry produces a clear answer. In some cases, early feedback from a council may be cautious, incomplete, or overly simplified. That does not necessarily mean the project cannot proceed. It may simply mean the proposal needs to be framed more clearly, supported by better technical information, or lodged in a more formal way.
If a council is not satisfied, ask which specific Building Code clause, regional rule, plan provision, product-evidence gap, site condition or consent requirement remains unresolved. This is more useful than debating whether composting toilets are “approved” in general.
Where the disagreement is about Building Code compliance, Building Act interpretation or a council decision, an MBIE determination may be a formal resolution option. Determinations are not usually the first step, but they can be relevant where there is a genuine dispute or question about the rules that apply to building work.
The most useful next move is usually to identify whether the issue is about building consent, resource consent, technical evidence, or council interpretation. That helps determine whether the next conversation should be with the council, a wastewater engineer, a consent specialist, or through a more formal determination pathway.
The exact information required depends on the council, site and pathway. The following items often help clarify the proposal early.
Toilet model and system type
Certification, standards or technical evidence
Installation manual and ventilation details
Use-load and capacity assumptions
Maintenance and owner-operation requirements
Site plan and building layout
Greywater collection and disposal pathway
Any urine, leachate or liquid-management pathway
Land application, setbacks and soil information
Wastewater designer or engineering input where needed
In many projects, the most practical way to save time is to identify the likely pathway early and line up the right evidence from the start. That may include product information, site details, wastewater design input, or a clearer description of how the whole sanitation arrangement will work.
Where a project includes other building work, it is often better to think about the sanitation system as part of the wider project rather than as an afterthought. That does not mean every project is complicated. It means the best results usually come when the pathway is treated as part of the design process rather than as a surprise issue at the end.
WCTNZ® can help you assess the likely compliance route early, including whether your project may need stronger product evidence, council engagement, wastewater design input, or a more formal consent pathway before the wrong assumptions are locked in.
For professional projects, WCTNZ® can assist with product evidence, council pathway summaries, model-specific documentation, certification references, technical resources and early project scoping. Site-specific design, engineering and consent preparation should still be completed by the appropriate qualified professional.
Legal Requirements of Composting Toilets
Three Recognised On-Site Wastewater Technology Pathways in New Zealand
Comparison of Building Product Certification & Assurance Schemes in NZ
Certified Technology & Product Evidence
The Role of Wastewater Engineers in Composting Toilet and Onsite Wastewater Compliance
This page provides general information only. It is not legal advice, engineering advice, wastewater design advice, or a substitute for project-specific advice from the relevant council, Building Consent Authority, wastewater designer, engineer, architect, licensed plumber, drainlayer or other qualified advisor involved in your project.
Rules, standards, council practice, interpretations, product evidence requirements and consent pathways can change. Always check the current position for your site and project before relying on general pathway information.
WCTNZ® | Waterless Composting Toilets NZ Limited
© 2026 WCTNZ® | Waterless Composting Toilets NZ Limited. All Rights Reserved. This page is provided as general pathway information and may be updated as further council guidance, official information responses, standards information or public-source material becomes available.
Last reviewed: July 2026.
© 2026 WCTNZ® | Waterless Composting Toilets NZ Limited. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorised reproduction, distribution, display, or transmission of any content, design, trademarks, or other materials on this site is strictly prohibited without prior written consent. All intellectual property rights are the exclusive property of WCTNZ® | Waterless Composting Toilets NZ Limited. Continued use of this site indicates your acceptance of our terms and policies, which you affirm to have read and understood. We reserve the right to modify or remove any content at any time without notice. This site and its contents are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind.
Monthly News: Current affairs in NZ wastewater
Monthly Promotion: Special & one-off deals
Monthly The Humanist: Tips, tricks & advice on composting toilets